Can Intrapartum Ultrasonography Improve the Placement of the Vacuum Cup in Operative Vaginal Deliveries?

Although the fetal head position has traditionally been evaluated by digital examination (DE), it has a failure rate ranging between 20 and 70%; hence, intrapartum transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) has become relevant. We aimed to evaluate the utility of the TUS to identify the fetal head positions in vacuum-assisted deliveries. We performed a prospective observational study including 101 pregnant patients in active labor who required a vacuum-assisted delivery. The fetal head position was assessed by a DE and a TUS prior to vacuum cup placement. After delivery, the optimal vacuum cup placement was evaluated as the distance between the chignon and the flexion point ≤2 cm. The general concordance rate between the DE and TUS was 72.2%, with the poorest concordance rate for occiput posterior positions at 46.1%. In five cases (4.9%), it was not possible to determine the fetal head position through the DE. The correlation was higher in low and medium planes, with 77% and 68.1% concordance rates, respectively, while it was lower in high planes (60%). In 90.1% of cases, the vacuum cup placement was optimal. Our findings show that intrapartum transabdominal ultrasonography is a useful technique to identify the fetal head position allowing optimal placement of the vacuum cup necessary for correct vacuum-assisted delivery.

Cranial ultrasound screening in term and late preterm neonates born by vacuum-assisted delivery: Is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Vacuum extraction is the most common choice to assist vaginal delivery, but there are still concerns regarding the neonatal injuries it may cause. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of intracranial injuries assessed by cranial ultrasound (cUS) among infants born by vacuum extraction, and the relationship with maternal and perinatal factors. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study carried out in a level-3 neonatal unit. A total of 593 term and late preterm infants born by vacuum-assisted delivery were examined with a cUS scan within 3 days after birth. RESULTS: Major head injuries were clinically silent and occurred in 2% of the infants, with a rate of intracranial haemorrhage of 1.7%. Regardless of obstetric factors, the risk of cranial injury was increased in infants requiring resuscitation at birth (p = 0.04, OR 4.1), admitted to NICU (p = 0.01, OR 5.5) or with perinatal asphyxia (p < 0.01, OR 21.3). Maternal age ≥40 years correlated both with adverse perinatal outcomes (p < 0.05) and the occurrence of major injury (p = 0.02, OR 4.6). CONCLUSION: Overall, vacuum extraction is a safe procedure for neonates. Head injuries are usually mild and asymptomatic, and with spontaneous recovery. However, the rate of major cranial injuries in our cohort warrants further investigation to support a cUS screening, particularly for infants requiring respiratory support at birth. Also, maternal age might be taken into account when evaluating the risk for neonatal complications after vacuum application.

Influence of introducing a maneuverable vacuum extractor cup on maternal hospital stay after instrumental birth. Retrospective cohort study / Repercusión de la introducción de la ventosa obstétrica maniobrable en un centro hospitalario sobre la estancia materna tras parto instrumental. Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo

Objectives: The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of the introduction of a maneuverable vacuum extractor cup on the length of hospital stay after assisted vaginal birth in nulliparous women in a hospital where no vacuum devices were used. Methods: This single center retrospective analytical study included two groups of nulliparous women who had undergone an assisted vaginal birth. The 2 groups differ according to the availability or not of a maneuverable vacuum extractor cup. The first group includes the last 54 instrumental births until May 2017, when only obstetric forceps and Thierry's spatulas were available in our center; the second group includes the first 54 instrumental births since May 2018 in our center, when obstetric forceps, Thierry's spatulas and maneuverable vacuum extractor cup were available. Maneuverable vacuum extractor cups had been available for 12 months in the second group. Results: In the no vacuum cup group, Kjelland forceps and Thierry's spatulas were used in 29 (53.7%) and 25 (46.3%) of the 54 assisted vaginal births, respectively. In the vacuum available group, a vacuum cup was chosen in 30 (55.6%), Kjelland forceps were used in 18 (33.3%) and Thierry's spatulas in 6 (11.1%) of the assisted vaginal births. 22 women (40.7%) had a postpartum hospital stay longer than 3 days in the group with no maneuverable vacuum extractor cup availability, versus 3 women (5.6%) in the group with availability of a maneuverable vacuum extractor cup, p<0.001. Average postpartum hospital stay length was 3.17±0.803 days versus 2.81±0.585, p<0.001. There was also a significant reduction in the number of episiotomies. Conclusion: The introduction of a maneuverable vacuum extractor cup in a center where only forceps and Thierry's spatulas had been used resulted in a decrease in postpartum hospital stay in nulliparous women.(AU)

Objetivos: El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar el impacto de la introducción de una ventosa obstétrica con cazoleta maniobrable en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria tras parto instrumental en mujeres nulíparas en un hospital donde no se utilizaban ventosas obstétricas. Métodos: Este estudio de cohortes retrospectivo unicéntrico incluyó 2 grupos de mujeres nulíparas sometidas a parto instrumental. Los 2 grupos se diferencian según la disponibilidad o no de ventosa obstétrica en el centro. El primer grupo se compone de las últimas 54 mujeres a las que se les asistió un parto instrumental hasta mayo del 2017, cuando solo había disponibilidad de fórceps obstétricos y espátulas de Thierry en nuestro centro; el segundo grupo se compone de las primeras 54 mujeres a las que se les asistió un parto instrumental desde mayo del 2018 en nuestro centro, cuando había disponibilidad de fórceps obstétricos, de espátulas de Thierry y de ventosa obstétrica con cazoleta maniobrable (esta última desde hacía 12 meses). Resultados: En el grupo sin disponibilidad de ventosa obstétrica, se utilizaron fórceps de Kjelland y espátulas de Thierry en 29 (53,7%) y 25 (46,3%) de los 54 partos instrumentales, respectivamente. En el grupo con disponibilidad de ventosa, se usó la ventosa en 30 (55,6%), fórceps de Kjelland en 18 (33,3%) y espátulas de Thierry en 6 (11,1%) de los partos instrumentales; 22 mujeres (40,7%) tuvieron una estancia hospitalaria tras el parto mayor de 3 días en el grupo sin disponibilidad de ventosa, frente a 3 mujeres (5,6%) en el grupo con disponibilidad de ventosa, p<0,001. La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria tras el parto fue de 3,17±0,803 días frente a 2,81±0,585, p<0,001. También hubo una reducción significativa en el número de episiotomías.(AU)

Traction force profile in children with severe perinatal outcomes delivered with a digital vacuum extraction handle: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: During the second stage of labor, vacuum-assisted delivery is an alternative to forceps delivery and emergency cesarean section. Extensive research concerning perinatal outcomes has indicated that the risk of complications, although rare, is higher than with a spontaneous vaginal delivery. An important factor related to perinatal outcomes is the traction force applied. Our research group previously developed a digital extraction handle, the Vacuum Intelligent Handle-3 (VIH3), that measures and records traction force. The objective of this study was to compare traction force profiles in children with and without severe perinatal outcomes delivered with the digital handle. A secondary aim was to establish a safe force limit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an observational case-control study at the delivery ward at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. In total, 573 children delivered with the digital handle between 2012 and 2018 were included. Cases were defined as a composite of severe perinatal outcomes, including subgaleal hematoma, intracranial hemorrhage, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy 1-3, seizures or death. The cases in the cohort were matched 1:3 based on five matching variables. Traction profiles were analyzed using the MATLAB® software and conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of severe perinatal outcomes was 2.3%. The 13 cases were matched with three controls each (n = 39). A statistically significant increased odds for higher total traction forces was seen in the case group (odds ratio [OR] 1.004; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.007) and for the peak force (OR 1.022; 95% CI 1.004-1.041). Several procedure-related parameters were significantly increased in the case group. As expected, some neonatal characteristics also differed significantly. An upper force limit of 343 Newton minutes (Nmin) revealed an 86% reduction in severe perinatal outcomes (adjusted OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.04-0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Children with severe perinatal outcomes had traction force profiles with significantly higher forces. The odds for severe perinatal outcomes increased for every increase in Nmin and Newton used during the extraction procedure. A calculated total force level of 343 Nmin is suggested as an upper safety limit, but this must be tested prospectively to provide validity.

Mild neonatal complications following guideline-compliant vacuum-assisted delivery in Japan: improvements still needed.

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal cephalohematoma and hyperbilirubinemia are often encountered after vacuum-assisted delivery. For safe obstetric practice, guidelines for vacuum procedure were published in 2014 in Japan. We aimed to identify the risk of mild neonatal complications since guideline introduction. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included singleton deliveries at term gestation from 2015 to 2019 at a single perinatal center in Japan. Incidences of neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy, cephalohematoma, and umbilical artery pH <7.10 were determined and risk factors relevant to the development of hyperbilirubinemia were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1010 deliveries during the study period, vacuum procedures were attempted in 183 (18%). Guideline recommendations were fully adhered to in over 98% of vacuum procedures. Phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia was performed in 75 (41%) of 183 deliveries with vacuum procedure, cephalohematoma occurred in 35 (19%), and umbilical artery pH <7.10 was observed in 10 (5.5%), all of which were significantly higher than without vacuum procedure, such as hyperbilirubinemia (11%, risk ratio [RR] = 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9 - 4.9, p < .0001), cephalohematoma (1.0%, RR = 19.8, 95%CI = 9.3 - 41.9, p < .0001), and umbilical artery pH <7.10 (0.6%, RR = 9.0, 95%CI = 3.1 - 26.1, p < .0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that vacuum procedure was the factor most strongly associated with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (odds ratio = 3.5, 95%CI = 2.2 - 5.5, p < .0001). DISCUSSION: Vacuum procedure is an important option for the safe vaginal delivery. However, neonates should be observed for development of jaundice to prevent kernicterus even after optimally performed vacuum-assisted delivery.

Adverse outcomes in vacuum-assisted delivery after detachment of non-metal cup: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with detachment of non-metal vacuum cup during delivery and to identify risk factors for these detachments. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women with singleton pregnancy, who underwent vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery with a non-metal vacuum cup in a single academic institution, January 2014-August 2019. Failed vacuum deliveries were excluded. Primary outcomes were defined as subgaleal hematoma (SGH) and cord blood pH < 7.15. Secondary outcome included other neonatal complications and adverse maternal outcomes. Outcomes were compared between vacuum-assisted deliveries with and without cup detachment during the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 3246 women had successful VAD and met the inclusion criteria. During the procedure, the cup detached at least once in 665 (20.5%) deliveries and did not detach in 2581 (79.5%). The cup detachment group experienced higher rates of SGH (8.9% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.001) and cord blood pH < 7.15 (9.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.03). There were also more neonatal intensive care unit admissions (NICU) (4.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.03) and more fetuses with occiput posterior position (70.8% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.001), the vacuum duration was slightly longer (6 ± 3.7 vs. 5 ± 2.9 min) and more neonates had birth weights > 3700 g (14.1% vs, 10.3%, p = 0.006). Interestingly, there were more males in that group (60.6 vs. 54.6, p = 0.005). All these factors remained significant after controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum cup detachment has several predictive characteristics and is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes that should be incorporated into decisions made during the procedure.

Association between the number of pulls and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes in vacuum-assisted delivery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between the number of pulls during vacuum-assisted deliver and neonatal and maternal complications. METHODS: This was a single-center observational study using a cohort of pregnancies who underwent vacuum-assisted delivery from 2013 to 2020. We excluded pregnancies transitioning to cesarean section after a failed attempt at vacuum-assisted delivery. The number of pulls to deliver the neonate was categorized into 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 pulls. We used logistic regression models to investigate the association between the number of pulls and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and maternal composite outcome (severe perineal laceration, cervical laceration, transfusion, and postpartum hemorrhage ≥500 mL). RESULTS: We extracted 480 vacuum-assisted deliveries among 7,321 vaginal deliveries. The proportion of pregnancies receiving 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 pulls were 51.9, 28.3, 10.8, and 9.0%, respectively. The crude prevalence of NICU admission with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 pulls were 10.8, 16.2, 15.4, and 27.9%, respectively. The prevalence of NICU admission, amount of postpartum hemorrhage, and postpartum hemorrhage ≥500 mL were significantly different between the four groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found the prevalence of NICU admission in the ≥4 pulls group was significantly higher compared with the 1 pull group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-7.8). In contrast, maternal complications were not significantly associated with the number of pulls. CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum-assisted delivery with four or more pulls was significantly associated with an increased risk of NICU admission. However, the number of pulls was not associated with maternal complications.

Amniotic fluid embolism - implementation of international diagnosis criteria and subsequent pregnancy recurrence risk.

OBJECTIVES: An international diagnostic criterion for amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) diagnosis has recently been published. Data regarding subsequent pregnancies is scarce. We sought to implement recent diagnostic criteria and detail subsequent pregnancies in survivors. METHODS: A case series of all suspected AFE cases at a tertiary medical center between 2003 and 2018 is presented. Cases meeting the diagnostic criteria for AFE were included. Clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes described. Pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies in AFE survivors detailed. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2018 14 women were clinically suspected with AFE and 12 of them (85.71%) met the diagnostic criteria for AFE. Three cases occurred during midtrimester dilation and evacuation procedures, and the remaining occurred in the antepartum period. Of the antepartum cases, mode of delivery was cesarean delivery or vacuum extraction for expedited delivery due to presentation of AFE in 8/9 cases (88.88%). Clinical presentation included cardiovascular collapse, respiratory distress and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). Heart failure of varying severity was diagnosed in 75% (9/12) cases. Composite maternal morbidity was 5/12 (41.66%), without cases of maternal mortality. 11 subsequent pregnancies occurred in four AFE survivors. Pregnant women were followed by a high-risk pregnancy specialist and multidisciplinary team if pregnancy continued beyond the early second trimester. Six pregnancies resulted in a term delivery. No recurrences of AFE were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a diagnostic criterion for diagnosis of AFE results in a more precise diagnosis of AFE. Nevertheless, the accuracy of clinical diagnosis is still high. Subsequent pregnancies were not associated with AFE recurrence.

The role of mediolateral episiotomy during vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery with soft cup devices.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether episiotomy during vacuum-assisted delivery leads to fewer third- and fourth-degree tears. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all nulliparas who underwent a singleton, soft cup, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery in one institution, from January 2014 to August 2019. Failed vacuum deliveries were excluded. Based on power analysis calculation, a sample size of 500 women in each group was sufficient to detect an advantage of episiotomy, if present. Primary outcome was third- or fourth-degree perineal tear. Secondary outcomes were other maternal complications, and low neonatal cord pH and Apgar scores. Outcomes were compared between women with and without episiotomy. RESULTS: During the study period, 2370 nulliparas had a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery using soft vacuum cup and met the study inclusion criteria. Episiotomy was performed in 1868 (79%) women, and 502 (21%) delivered without episiotomy. Background characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the rates of third and fourth grade perineal lacerations between the two groups. Episiotomy was associated with higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (p < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: Using selective episiotomy for patients delivering vaginally with the assistance of soft cap vacuum does not increase third- or fourth-degree perineal tears.

Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery - A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The role of intrapartum ultrasound as an ancillary method to instrumental vaginal delivery is yet to be determined. This study aimed to compare the use of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound with routine clinical care before performing an instrumental vaginal delivery, regarding the incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2016 and March 2019 in two tertiary care maternity hospitals in Lisbon, Portugal. Women at term, with full cervical dilatation, singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation, and with an established indication for instrumental vaginal delivery, were approached for enrollment. After informed consent was obtained, randomization into one of two groups was carried out. In the experimental arm, women underwent transabdominal ultrasound for determination of the fetal head position and transperineal ultrasound for evaluation of the angle of progression, before instrumental vaginal delivery. In the control arm, no ultrasound was carried out before instrumental vaginal delivery. Primary outcomes were composite measures of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Composite maternal morbidity consisted of severe postpartum hemorrhage, perineal trauma, and prolonged hospital stay. Composite neonatal morbidity consisted of low 5-minute Apgar score, umbilical artery metabolic acidosis, birth trauma, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: A total of 222 women were enrolled (113 in the experimental arm and 109 in the control arm). No significant differences between the two arms were found in composite measures of maternal (23.9% in the experimental group vs 22.9% in the control group, odds ratio 1.055, 95% CI 0.567-1.964) or neonatal morbidity (9.7% in the experimental group vs 6.4% in the control group, odds ratio 1.571, 95% CI 0.586-4.215), nor in any of the individual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this small randomized controlled trial that was stopped for futility before reaching the required sample size, transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound performed just before instrumental vaginal delivery did not reduce the incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, when compared with routine clinical care.

Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization does not recommend dilatation and sharp curettage (D&C) for the surgical treatment of miscarriage during the first trimester because this may cause Asherman's syndrome due to endometrial damage; therefore, suction remains the primary treatment option. While manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) has been widely used since the 1990s outside Japan, the use of an MVA device (Women's MVA system) was approved in Japan in October 2015. Here, we examined the efficacy of the MVA kit in women surgically treated for miscarriage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at the International University of Health and Welfare Hospital in Japan. Women who underwent surgical treatment for miscarriage within 12 weeks of pregnancy were identified and enrolled in the study. A total of 404 women were included who underwent the following procedures: 121 D&C, 123 electric vacuum aspiration (EVA), and 160 MVA. For each participant, the duration of surgery, amount of bleeding, amount of anesthetic used, incomplete abortion requiring repeat procedures, and intraoperative/postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was 13.7 ± 7.2, 11.2 ± 4.2, and 6.9 ± 4.3 min in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 1.00). The amount of anesthetic used was not significantly different among all groups. Bleeding of ≥ 100 mL was confirmed in three (2.4%), one (0.8%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.50). Incomplete abortion was identified in three (2.4%), two (1.6%), and one (0.6%) patient(s) in the D&C, EVA, and MVA groups, respectively (p = 0.61). However, severe intraoperative/postoperative complications were not observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for miscarriage performed using the MVA kit has safety and efficacy similar to those of conventional methods, such as D&C and EVA.

Association of traction force and adverse neonatal outcome in vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Traction force is a possible risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome in vacuum extraction delivery, but the knowledge is scarce and further investigation is needed. Our hypothesis was that high-level traction force increases the risk of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a hospital-based prospective cohort study on low- and mid-vacuum extractions at the labor and delivery ward, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden. Traction forces were measured in 331 women. An electronical handle was used to measure and register traction force. The main exposure variable was high-level traction force (≥75th percentile) during the first three pulls and the primary outcome was admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk. RESULTS: Among the exposed, 14/84 (16.7%) were admitted to neonatal intensive care, and among the unexposed 10/247 (4%). The crude odds ratio (OR) of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit when exposed to high-level traction force was 4.7, and the adjusted (birthweight, gestational length, cup detachment, number of pulls, duration, duration >15 minutes, mid-cavity fetal head station, failed extraction, indication and parity) OR was 2.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-7.48). No significant effect was seen in Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes or pH <7.1. CONCLUSIONS: High-level traction force may be a risk factor for neonatal complications. Although these results do not mandate any alterations in clinical guidelines, perioperative feedback on traction force may be useful to alert the obstetrician to a timely conversion to cesarean section. To study plausible traction force specific outcomes such as head traumas, a larger sample size is required.

Which technique is better to place a manoeuvrable vacuum extractor cup on the flexion point? Vacca vs. Bird technique.

Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare the vacuum extractor cup application technique described by Bird vs. the technique described by Vacca on a simulation model. Methods Six obstetricians participated in the study. Each obstetrician performed eight vacuum assisted deliveries using the Bird technique and eight vacuum assisted deliveries using the Vacca 5-Steps technique. Results A total of 96 vacuum assisted deliveries were performed. The mean distance from the centre of the cup to the flexion point was 1.78±0.96 cm for the Bird technique and 1.05±0.60 cm for the Vacca technique (p<0.001). The lateral distance (over the parietal bone) was 1.16±0.69 cm for the Bird technique and 0.66±0.52 cm for the Vacca technique (p<0.001). The vertical distance (towards the frontal or occipital bone) was 1.12±1.02 cm for the Bird technique and 0.67±0.55 cm for the Vacca technique (p=0.009). In occipito anterior positions, there were no significant differences between both techniques. Conclusions The Vacca technique was better in transverse and posterior positions.

The role of fetal head circumference in the formation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following vacuum deliveries among primiparous women.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of sonographic fetal head circumference (HC) with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) occurrence among primiparous women who underwent vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD). METHODS: A retrospective study of all primiparous women who delivered at term by VAD between 2011 and 2019 and underwent ultrasound with fetal biometry within 1 week prior to delivery. Women who suffered OASIS were compared to women without OASIS. RESULTS: Overall, 74 of 3222 (2.3%) primiparous women suffered an OASIS. As compared with control, women with OASIS were younger (median 28 vs. 30 years, p = 0.001), had higher BMI (median 28.2 vs. 26.9 kg/m2, p = 0.03), and had a longer second stage of labor (median 190 vs. 168 min, p = 0.01). Fetal head circumference was larger in the OASIS group (mean 334 vs. 330 mm, p = 0.03), occiput posterior fetal head position was more prevalent (12 (16%) vs. 232 (7.4%), OR [95% CI]: 2.43 (1.29-4.57), p = 0.004), and the rate of mediolateral episiotomy performed was lower (58 (78.0%) vs. 2777 (88.2%), OR [95% CI]: 0.48 (0.27-0.85), p = 0.01). Multivariate regression modeling identified higher fetal HC (aOR [95% CI] 1.03 (1.001-1.06), p = 0.04) and occiput posterior (aOR [95% CI] 2.5 (1.16-5.71), p = 0.01) as independently positively associated with OASIS. Mediolateral episiotomy and maternal age were independently negatively associated with an OASIS (aOR [95% CI] 0.39 (0.18-0.85), p = 0.01); aOR [95% CI] 0.4 (0.17-0.60), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic large fetal HC is associated with OASIS occurrence during VAD. The only modifiable predictor of OASIS detected was mediolateral episiotomy, found to be protective against OASIS.

SMFM Special Statement: Operative vaginal delivery: checklists for performance and documentation.

The frequency of operative vaginal delivery has been declining, even though it can be an attractive alternative to cesarean delivery in selected cases. Performance of operative vaginal delivery required consideration of many indications, contraindications, and prerequisites. Optimal documentation of operative vaginal delivery requires the recording of several specific elements that are unique to forceps or vacuum delivery. A cognitive aid such as a checklist is well suited to this situation in which there are numerous elements to consider, a low frequency of performance, and teams with variable expertise. We propose 2 checklists to help ensure that all relevant elements are considered for every operative vaginal delivery: (1) a checklist for preparation and performance of the procedure and (2) a checklist for documentation. We suggest practical tips to help facilities adapt these checklists to their own circumstances and implement them on their units.

Vacuum extraction delivery at first vaginal birth following cesarean: maternal and neonatal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal morbidity outcome associated with vacuum assisted (VA) vaginal delivery at first vaginal birth following a previous cesarean delivery (CD). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective computerized study conducted at a single tertiary center, between 2005 and 2018. The study compared the morbidity outcome of VA vaginal delivery between two groups of parturients at their first vaginal birth; primigravid and those in second delivery with a prior cesarean. The primary outcome was the maternal adverse outcome: postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), anal sphincter injuries, retained placenta, shoulder dystocia, uterine rupture, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Secondary outcome was the neonatal adverse outcome: Apgar score, NICU admission, meconium aspiration, jaundice, sepsis, birth trauma, and death. Univariate analysis was followed by a multiple logistic regression model controlling for potential confounders, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: During the study period, we identified 3695 parturients that engaged in Trial of labor after cesarean with no previous vaginal birth, among which 679 (18.4%) delivered by Vacuum (VA-VBAC). These were compared to 6544/43,083 (15.2%) primigravid delivered by Vacuum. The VA-VBAC group had higher risk of PPH (10.5% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.01), blood transfusions (5.6% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.01), retained placenta (10.2% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.01), and uterine rupture (0.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). The adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable among groups. CONCLUSION: The VA-VBAC has a higher risk of maternal postpartum hemorrhagic complications; preventive measures should be directed to this selected group of operative vaginal deliveries.

Maternal complication related to instrumental delivery at Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine proportion and risk factors for maternal complication related to forceps and vacuum delivery among mother who gave birth at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (FHCSH). RESULTS: Records of 406 mothers managed with instrumental vaginal delivery were reviewed and 97% of the reviewed card had complete documentation. The proportion of maternal complications related to instrumental delivery was 12.1%. A major complication of forceps assisted delivery was 2nd-degree perineal tear (7.4%), 3rd-degree perineal tear (1.5%), cervical tear (1.5%) and episiotomy extension (1%). However, the complication of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery was only cervical tear (0.5%) and episiotomy extension (0.5%). Episiotomy during instrumental delivery reduce maternal complication by 86% [AOR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.3]. Forceps assisted vaginal delivery had 3.4 times more risk for maternal complication compared to vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery [AOR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.08-10.67] and the same is true for primiparity that primipara women who gave birth by the help of instrument had 3.5 times more risk for maternal complication compared to a multipara women [AOR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.26-9.98].

Impact of epidural on labor duration and vacuum deliveries in twin gestations.

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia may lead to a prolonged second stage, and increased instrumental vaginal deliveries rate in singleton gestations. We aimed to examine the association between epidural and vacuum deliveries rate and second stage duration among twin deliveries. METHODS: Retrospective study conducted at a single teaching hospital on data between January 1995 and December 2015. All twin pregnancies, >24 weeks that had a trial of labor were included. Twins with major malformations, intrauterine death, or had a caesarean delivery without a trial of labor, were excluded. Women were divided to those who had an epidural analgesia (group 1) and those who did not (group 2). Primary outcome was vacuum delivery rate. RESULTS: Of all 1955 twin pregnancies delivered during the study period, 827 (42.3%) were eligible and included; 332 (40.1%) in group 1 and 495 (59.9%) in group 2. Vacuum delivery rate of any twin was 7.5% and 6.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.48; Relative Risk 1.20; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.72-2.0). Vacuum delivery rate of first twin only or second twin only did not differ significantly as well. After adjusting for variables that differed significantly between the groups in univariate analysis, second stage duration of first and second twins in group 1 was significantly longer than in group 2 (p = 0.001; ratio=1.66; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.42-1.94 and p = 0.001; ratio=1.40; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.24-1.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural use in twin deliveries did not affect vacuum deliveries rate. Epidural was associated with a prolonged second stage of both twins.

[Short-term neonatal outcomes of vacuum-assisted delivery. A case-control study]. / Complicaciones neonatales a corto plazo de los partos por ventosa. Estudio caso-control.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries compared to all other vaginal deliveries, and to identify the associated risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a level iii maternity hospital between 2012 and 2016, including 1,802 vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries and 2control groups: 1802 spontaneous deliveries and 909 forceps-assisted deliveries. We considered minor complications (soft tissue trauma, cephalohaematoma, jaundice, intensive phototherapy, transient brachial plexus injury) and major complications (hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, intracranial and subgaleal haemorrhage, seizures, cranial fracture, permanent brachial plexus injury), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and death. RESULTS: The risk of soft tissue trauma (aOR, 2.4; P<.001), cephalohaematoma (aOR, 5.5; P<.001), jaundice (aOR, 4.4; P<.001), intensive phototherapy (aOR, 2.1; P<.001) and transient brachial plexus injury (aOR; 2.1, P=.006) was higher in vacuum deliveries compared to spontaneous deliveries. Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit was also higher in vacuum deliveries compared to spontaneous deliveries (OR, 1.9; P=.001). When we compared vacuum with forceps deliveries, we found a higher risk of soft tissue trauma (OR, 2.1; P=.004), cephalohaematoma (OR, 2.2, P=.046) and jaundice (OR, 1.4; P=.012). Major complications were more frequent in the vacuum group comparing with the control groups, but the difference was not significant. The 2deaths occurred in vacuum deliveries (1.1 per 1000). CONCLUSION: The proportion of minor neonatal complications was higher in the vacuum-assisted delivery group. Although major complications and death were also more frequent, they were uncommon, with no significant differences compared to the other groups. There are obstetrical indications for vacuum delivery, but it should alert to the need to watch for potential neonatal complications.

Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) occurs in 5%-7% of normal deliveries and increases with vacuum extraction (VE) to 12%-14% in nulliparous women in Sweden. Lateral/mediolateral episiotomy may reduce the prevalence of OASIS at VE in nulliparous women. The current use of episiotomy is restrictive. The protective effect and consequences are uncertain. This trial will investigate if lateral episiotomy can reduce the prevalence of OASIS and assess short-term and long-term effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial of lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy in nulliparous women with a singleton, live fetus, after gestational week 34+0 with indication for VE. A lateral episiotomy of 4 cm is cut at crowning, 1-3 cm from the midline, at a 60° angle. The primary outcome is OASIS by clinical diagnosis analysed according to intention to treat. To demonstrate a 50% reduction in OASIS prevalence (from 12.4% to 6.2%), 710 women will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio. Secondary outcomes are pain, blood loss, other perineal injuries, perineal complications, Apgar score, cord pH and neonatal complications. Web-based questionnaires at baseline, 2 months, 1 and 5 years will be used to assess pain, incontinence, prolapse, sexual function, quality of life and childbirth experience. A subset of women will receive follow-up by pelvic floor sonography and pelvic examination. Mode of delivery and recurrence of OASIS/episiotomy in subsequent pregnancies will be assessed at 5 and 10 years using register data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is open for enrolment. The trial has received ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Review Board of Stockholm and full funding from the Swedish Research Council. Women are interested in participation. The predominant restrictive view on episiotomy may limit recruitment. Results are of global interest and will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02643108; Pre-results.